23 Dodge Ram Rebel 5.7L now sells more than 500,000 cars.

Tel: Manager Gao 15022084111 (same as WeChat)

There are two exhaust pipes on both sides of the rebel 1500 pickup truck, which are full of domineering, allowing the sound of the 5.7 V8 engine to be output at will. Having a rebel and buying an RV to drag you around can let you take your family to find poetry and the distance. It is not so much a miniature version of Tyrannosaurus Dodge as a brother of Tyrannosaurus Rex, because many designs of Tyrannosaurus Rex originated from rebels.

  Basic configuration: 3.92 rear axle ratio 7-inch Rebel theme color driving computer central control 5: 00 touch screen (UConnect 3) 115 V power interface LED fog light LED headlights with black border LED taillight glove box light black badge black tailgate badge Rebel badge black bottom two-color paint/fender black powder coating front and rear bumpers black grille black exterior rearview mirror: heating, Electric folding electronic time-sharing shift transfer box rear differential lock Bilstein? performance shock absorption sports performance hood full-length floor center console front collision warning with active braking steep slope descent cross-country rubber mat leather bucket seat electric main driver 8-way, with 2-way lumbar support electric sliding rear window skid plate (transfer box, steering system, front suspension, fuel tank) leather door trim plate towing hook 18-inch black aluminum wheel, 275/70 R18 four-season tire.

  First-class package configuration: front heating seat heating steering wheel electric adjustable pedal Rear ceiling lamp Rear window defroster with lighting cosmetic mirror Sun visor 8.4-inch touch screen supports Apple Carplay universal garage to open night bag configuration: ?18×8-inch bright black wheel hub black front bumper black air intake grille Tel: Manager Gao 15022084111 (same as WeChat)

  If T-Rex Dodge Ram is responsible for the sales of its series, it must make a great contribution to its predecessor Ram Rebel! Because many design concepts of Tyrannosaurus Rex are based on the essence of rebels.

  Many card friends are unfamiliar with rebels. In fact, it is not a new model. It was introduced in China as early as 2017. Later, we stopped introducing it for various reasons. At present, the new model has arrived in the store. The rebel’s appearance is very domineering, and the huge logo shows its powerful performance. The steel front sand guard and 18-inch off-road wheels below with the original off-road tires remind us that it is born for off-road.

  The design of the interior is very family-oriented, and the layout of various function buttons is exactly the same as that of the same brand’s horn and sports version. The electronic knob handle and the 12-storage vertical screen navigation screen are very scientific and technological.

  Our advantage: vehicles can enjoy national warranty, warranty, replacement and return. We have many years of successful experience in customer service and provide you with the best solution that suits you. Every car we provide for you has undergone strict PDI inspection, and there is a quality guarantee that can reassure you after sale. We provide you with original and pure accessories and efficient and high-quality maintenance services. The most advanced technology and equipment, all-round quality service and high-quality staff. All models sold in our shop are regular brand-new commercial vehicles. You can enjoy the national three guarantees policy. And can be maintained in a regular 4S shop authorized by any manufacturer in the country and after maintenance. On the day of car purchase, the company can issue all vehicle procedures (customs clearance). Commodity inspection Invoice. Certificate of approval. Certificate of conformity. Vehicle information table. Vehicle instruction manual. Three packs of classes. Maintenance cards, etc.) to ensure that all foreign customers can settle down locally.

  Company name: Tianjin Xiangruitong Automobile Sales & Service Co., Ltd. (Binhai Branch)

  Company Address: Tianjin Binhai New Area Bonded Zone International Automobile City

  Tel: Manager Gao 15022084111 (same as WeChat)

  Disclaimer: The above car purchase preferential information is provided by the comprehensive dealers of this website, and the price fluctuates greatly due to market factors, which is only for car purchase reference; The distributor is responsible for its authenticity, accuracy and legality, and this website does not provide any guarantee or assume any legal responsibility.

Tear off the mask of free competition and curb China’s technological development. How many "devils" are hidden in the US "Chip Act"?

  [Global Times reporter Yuan Jirong] In order to suppress and contain the rising China science and technology and safeguard American hegemony, Washington has increasingly turned to the core of the digital economy — — In the field of chips. On August 15th, the US Department of Commerce implemented export control on EDA software known as "the mother of chips". Previously, the United States had promulgated the Chip and Technology Act of 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the "Chip Act") on July 28th. The purpose of this bill is to cut off the supply of advanced technology, equipment and materials for chip manufacturing to China, accelerate the return of the chip industry to the United States through subsidies, cut off the contact between China’s chip industry and the world, and reshape the supply chain pattern of the global chip industry chain. Obviously, this is a wishful plan of the United States. So how many "devils" are hidden in the "Chip Act" of the United States? Our reporter conducted an interview and investigation.

  In the five sub-chains, where do Chinese and American enterprises occupy?

  The main contents of the "Chip Act" in the United States include three items: one is to provide 52.7 billion US dollars of financial support to the semiconductor industry; The second is to provide enterprises with a 25% investment tax credit of about $24 billion; The third is to allocate about 200 billion US dollars to support cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence, robotics and quantum computing. The United States is trying to attract enterprises to set up factories in the United States, so as to concentrate the advanced process (below 28 nm) chip manufacturing industry in the United States, to confront China’s challenges in the semiconductor field, and to safeguard the technological hegemony of the United States. According to industry data, in 1990, the United States accounted for 37% of the global semiconductor manufacturing industry, and in 2020, this proportion dropped to 12%.

  In the related statement issued by the White House, the purpose of the "Chip Act" includes reducing costs, creating jobs, strengthening the supply chain and so on, so as to compete with China. To this end, the bill requires the establishment of four funds: the "American chip fund" totals 50 billion US dollars, of which 39 billion US dollars is used to encourage chip production and 11 billion US dollars is used to subsidize chip research and development; The "US Chip Defense Fund" has a total of 2 billion US dollars to subsidize the production of key chips related to national security, which will be allocated by the US Department of Defense in stages from 2022 to 2026; The "American Chip International Technology Security and Innovation Fund" has a total of 500 million US dollars to support the establishment of a safe and reliable semiconductor supply chain; The "American Chip Labor and Education Fund" has a total of 200 million US dollars to cultivate talents in the semiconductor industry.

  As the largest chip market in the world, China consumes about 3/4 of the chips in the world. But in the global chip industry chain, China is in the middle and lower reaches. Chip industry has its unique internal structure and industrial characteristics, and its industrial chain is divided into five sub-chains. The first is design. The largest chip design company in the world is ARM in Britain, EDA in the United States occupies a monopoly position in software design, and the design capability of Huawei Hisilicon can reach 7 nanometers. The second is manufacturing, including finished products and semi-finished products. Among them, semi-finished products generally refer to wafers, and high-purity wafers are basically monopolized by Japanese companies; Chip products are made on the basis of wafers, and the international output of SMIC is currently the fifth in the world. The third is packaging testing, which is basically labor-intensive, and the gap between China and the world is not big. The fourth is equipment production. The most sophisticated EUV mask aligner is ASML, the Netherlands, which is the only enterprise that can provide 7 nm process mask aligner. The equipment manufacturers that produce wafers are mainly in Japan, and companies such as Mitsubishi and Sony are dominant. Shanghai Microelectronics has been able to produce equipment for making 28 nm chips. The fifth is auxiliary materials. Including photoresist, mask, target, packaging substrate, etc., these materials are still facing bottlenecks in China enterprises.

  Geng Bo, deputy secretary-general of the Third Generation Semiconductor Industry Technology Innovation Strategic Alliance, told the Global Times reporter that "the layout of key patents involving upstream advanced process technology, some key raw materials, equipment and spare parts consumables is still not perfect". At present, there is a severe trade deficit in China’s integrated circuit industry, and some high-end chips are not completely self-sufficient. Take memory chips as an example. At present, American products account for half of the global market, South Korea accounts for about 25%, Japan accounts for 10%, Europe accounts for 8%, and China accounts for 3%.

  Killing is mainly in the manufacturing process.

  Recently, IC Insights, a well-known semiconductor research institution, released a report. In 2021, the chip scale consumed in China was about 186.5 billion US dollars, but the chip manufactured in Chinese mainland was only 31.2 billion US dollars, accounting for only 16.7%. The "Chip Act" of the United States mainly focuses on the following aspects, with the intention of strangling China’s chip industry in its infancy.

  First, the technology, equipment and materials below 28 nm are blocked from China. Han Xiaomin, general manager of Jiwei Consulting, told reporters that the restrictions of the chip bill are mainly reflected in two aspects: First, supply chain resources such as equipment and materials related to advanced manufacturing are continuously prohibited from being given to local enterprises in China, and the research and development progress of China enterprises in the field of advanced manufacturing is suppressed; Second, chip companies supported by the Chip Act are required not to invest in advanced technology in Chinese mainland and continue to split the China market and the global supply system. Although the restrictions of the "Chip Act" mainly start from the manufacturing link, it will cooperate with a series of other restrictions. For example, EDA tools involving GAA process have just been banned from being used by China enterprises recently; Restrict American companies from providing China with the equipment needed to manufacture advanced chips; Pressure the Dutch government to ban ASML from selling deep ultraviolet mask aligner to China.

  Secondly, through subsidies, it is forbidden for companies receiving US federal funds to significantly increase production of advanced process chips in China for a period of 10 years. Companies that violate the ban or fail to correct the violation may need to refund the federal grant in full. According to the BBC, in the past, all American equipment manufacturers received a letter from the US Department of Commerce, informing them not to supply China with equipment for manufacturing chips of 14 nanometers or less. Tim Archer, chairman and CEO of American chip equipment manufacturer Panlin Semiconductor, said at the latest financial report that the scope of US technology export control to China will be further extended to foundries that produce chips below 14 nanometers.

  Before and after the "Chip Act" was signed, under the high-pressure atmosphere, many American semiconductor companies have announced that they will expand their investment in their own country. On August 9th, Micron announced that it will invest 40 billion dollars to make chips in the United States by 2030, and this action will be supported by the Chip Act. Reuters reported on the 8th that Qualcomm has agreed to purchase an additional $4.2 billion worth of semiconductor chips from Gexin’s new york factory, bringing its total purchase to $7.4 billion by 2028.

  Finally, we should promote the establishment of the "Four-Party Alliance of Chips" to further restrict the development of chips in China. This is a chip industry alliance between the United States, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan Province, which is intended to monopolize the high-end chip industry. It wants to integrate the chip manufacturing industry of American allies and set up a chip supply chain in the United States to exclude competitors.

  China’s Countermeasures

  Industry experts believe that in the short term, the "Chip Act" involves high-end OEM of advanced manufacturing technology, and memory has a great impact on China. However, in the long run, it is the consensus of domestic industry to carry out localization in related fields, and the restrictions of the bill can only accelerate this process. Geng Bo said that the upstream semiconductor equipment and materials will benefit from the continuous expansion of production and the acceleration of localization in China Wafer Factory. In view of the macro-policy blessing of localization and the uncertainty of international situation and supply chain security, China semiconductor industry should do a good job in top-level design and overall layout, increase policy support, strengthen international cooperation outside the United States, enlarge and strengthen the head enterprise, increase the training of industry talents and discipline construction, and strive to establish a certain closed-loop supply capacity in the industrial chain to prevent the recurrence of "core shortage tide".

  At the same time, for the United States, relying on a "chip bill" cannot reshape the glory of the local chip industry, and it is even more difficult to rebuild the manufacturing industry chain. Some industry experts said that the global "chip shortage" has been gradually eased this year, and there has even been a surplus in chip production, and many chips are being sold at reduced prices. This means that the chip industry is not a promising industry at least for the moment. Market investors are also confirming this judgment. After the release of the "Chip Act", the share prices of major semiconductor companies in the United States fell due to the decline in demand for early warning in the industry.

  Han Xiaomin said that the "Chip Act" can alleviate the strategic anxiety of the United States by attracting leading enterprises to set up factories in the United States through subsidies. However, it is not optimistic that the United States will truly become an advanced technology manufacturing base. Some experts believe that although China has not broken through the high-end chip manufacturing technology for the time being, it has chip factories accounting for half of the world’s total, and the "Chip Act" of the United States will promote Chinese enterprises to break through the technology. The domestic manufacturing industry in the United States is hollow and lacks talents, and it is impossible to form independent chip production capacity in a short time. According to the estimation of the Boston Consulting Group and other institutions, if the United States adopts the policy of "hard decoupling technology" from China, it may cause American semiconductor enterprises to lose 18% of the global market share and 37% of the revenue, and reduce 15,000 to 40,000 high-skilled jobs. This is tantamount to luring domestic enterprises away from the China market with a drop in the bucket subsidy.

Let researchers concentrate on their research

    Scientific research environment is a general term for all kinds of direct and indirect factors that affect scientific and technological personnel to engage in scientific research activities. A good scientific research environment is conducive to researchers to concentrate on research and stimulate their creative vitality, which is of great significance to promoting scientific and technological progress and implementing the innovation-driven development strategy.


 


    In recent years, the basic situation of scientific research environment in China has aroused widespread concern and debate from all walks of life, and has been highly valued by the relevant national science and technology management departments. In order to deeply understand the cognition of scientific researchers in various provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the Central Government) on the scientific research environment in their respective regions, the research group of the Institute of Science and Technology Policy and Management Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, with the support of the China Association for Science and Technology, selected five types of sites, including universities, research and development institutions, park enterprises, large and medium-sized industrial enterprises and medical and health institutions, and distributed 8,074 questionnaires to scientific researchers directly engaged in R&D activities, with 7,868 returned and 7,691 valid questionnaires. On the basis of this investigation, combined with the statistical data of science, technology, economy and society in 2012, this paper made a comprehensive evaluation of China’s scientific research environment.


 


The researchers gave positive comments on the current scientific research environment as a whole.


 


    First, the conditions of scientific research infrastructure have improved significantly, and nearly 30% of researchers feel that they have sufficient funds and full tasks.


 


    According to the survey, nearly 80% of the researchers think that the basic conditions of scientific research have improved obviously, among which 65% think that the basic conditions of scientific research in their institutions are at the middle and upper-middle level in China, 10% think that they are at a higher level in China, and only a little over 20% think that the basic conditions of their institutions are poor. At the same time, when it is necessary to obtain relevant experimental materials or consult scientific research references in scientific research activities, more than half of them feel convenient or very convenient, and only 20% think it is inconvenient or inconvenient. In terms of scientific research intensity and task fullness, nearly 30% feel full of funds and tasks, nearly 30% spend more than 40 hours a week directly engaged in scientific research activities, and nearly 30% feel that scientific research tasks are challenging. This reflects that in recent years, with the continuous increase in the total amount of scientific research funds invested by the central and local governments, the basic conditions of scientific research work in China have been greatly improved, and the tasks of scientific researchers are generally full, especially those who study abroad, have high academic qualifications, and have high professional titles. The recognition of the basic conditions of scientific research in their units is the highest.


 


    Second, the degree of scientific research cooperation and professional division of labor has been significantly strengthened, and researchers generally recognize the norms of teamwork.


 


    Institutions are equipped with full-time, high-level scientific research assistants, and the formation of a relatively close network of partners among scientific researchers is an important factor to improve the efficiency and level of scientific research work. The survey results show that the cooperation and professional division of labor among researchers have improved to some extent. In the same organization, the frequency ratio of other colleagues to undertake and complete the scientific research auxiliary work reaches 30%, which is higher than the frequency ratio of handling the scientific research auxiliary work by themselves without auxiliary personnel at all; At the same time, the frequency ratio of scientific research collaborators from their own institutions is as high as 44%, and the units where more than 85% of scientific researchers work actively encourage cross-departmental or inter-institutional cooperation. However, it is common for graduate students to help teachers undertake scientific research auxiliary work, which is much higher than the proportion of full-time auxiliary personnel, which shows that there is still much room for improvement in the scale of teamwork in scientific research units. About 40% of the team leaders’ influence comes from their academic level and strategic vision. About 40% of the team members have consultation and communication, and respect each member’s own choice. Another three quarters of the team results are distributed according to actual contributions, and more than half of the researchers have a strong sense of belonging to the team, which reflects the recognition of most researchers on the existing team cooperation model.


 


    Third, researchers give positive comments on the scientific research management ability of their units and are optimistic about the career development space.


 


    The survey shows that about 90% of researchers give positive comments on the overall impression of the scientific research management department of the unit, among which nearly 60% think that the auxiliary scientific research services and the overall innovation atmosphere of the unit are "generally acceptable" or "very good", and nearly 70% think that the current performance evaluation mechanism is reasonable. At the same time, most researchers have remained relatively stable in their work. From the observation of the flow of researchers in their own units in the past two years, more than 80% of researchers have not felt the frequent outflow of other researchers, and they are satisfied with the career development space in their own units. Only less than 15% researchers are "not satisfied" or "very dissatisfied" with the career development space in their own units, hoping for other better development opportunities. The work of the party and government organs is still attractive to a considerable number of researchers. If there is an opportunity to transfer to the party and government organs at the same level or to start a business, more than 50% of researchers will consider moving. Generally speaking, good working environment, personal development space, stable work, more learning opportunities, and giving full play to their abilities are the main reasons why most researchers choose to stay in their current work units.


 


    Fourth, the scientific and technological innovation policy has been well received by researchers, and the implementation and implementation need to be further strengthened.


 


    In recent years, the central and local governments have issued a series of policies and supporting measures to encourage scientific and technological innovation, attract high-level talents and promote the development of high-tech industries. Researchers generally recognize these incentive policies, and nearly 40% of them think that the policies are good and fully affirm them. More than half of the researchers still hope that the government will increase its encouragement and support. For the implementation of these policies, 8% of researchers think that the effect is very good, and 38% think that "some encouragement policies have been implemented, and the overall effect is ok", which is basically the same as the overall proportion of "the implementation is not good, the effect is not great, and these policies are basically not felt". This shows that the implementation of relevant science and technology policies has not been widely recognized, and the urgent task is to enhance the scientific nature of policies and further increase publicity and implementation.


 


Six outstanding problems reflected by scientific researchers


 


    First, a large number of institutions lack systematic and efficient innovation management capabilities.


 


    All kinds of institutions in Industry-University-Research generally don’t know enough about the law of creative activities in scientific research, which is manifested in the weak ability of specialized division of labor and cooperative management of scientific research organizations, and they are used to managing scientific researchers by means of administrative management and engineering management, and lack of supporting for truly valuable "creative" work, which makes a large number of scientific researchers’ enthusiasm consumed in low-level repetitive daily chores. On the one hand, scientific researchers frequently work overtime, on the other hand, about 70% of scientific researchers directly engage in scientific research activities for less than 40 hours a week. According to the survey, only 16% of the researchers think that the unit attaches great importance to innovation, and about 50% of the researchers think that the incentive effect of scientific research and innovation in their unit is not good; 34% of the respondents think that although the company has formulated some incentive measures, the overall incentive atmosphere for innovation has not yet emerged, and 8% of the respondents think that there is basically no difference between innovation and non-innovation in the company.


 


    Second, the investment and allocation of science and technology funds are not targeted to people.


 


    In recent years, China’s investment in scientific research has increased rapidly, and it has become the third largest country in the world. These greatly increased scientific and technological funds have achieved remarkable results in improving the basic conditions of scientific research and other "hardware facilities", but they are insufficient in investing people, especially young and middle-aged researchers with more innovative vitality. The survey shows that the current research funding, task pressure and work intensity basically present three "one-third" situations, that is, in terms of sufficient research funding and full tasks, there are one-third of people who feel full, average and lacking; In terms of the pressure and challenge of scientific research work, one-third of the people feel very stressed, less stressed and more moderate; At the same time, the proportion of people who spend more than 40 hours, less than 20 hours, and between 20 hours and 40 hours is also one-third of three. In addition, researchers with different professional titles have significant differences in their cognition of individual environment. The actual working time intensity and the proportion of challenging scientific research work of deputy senior and intermediate researchers are higher than those of senior researchers, but their satisfaction in scientific research activities, funding commitment and academic exchanges is lower than that of senior researchers, which also shows that the allocation of scientific and technological resources is insufficient to support this group.


 


    Third, most researchers still lack high-level and international academic exchange opportunities.


 


    It is found that the internationalization level of scientific and technological research in China has become an important factor that restricts the improvement of scientific researchers’ ability. 44% of researchers "mainly participate in academic conferences or scientific and technological group exchanges organized by domestic organizations", and two-thirds of researchers choose to publish their scientific research results in China because "there will be some language or channel barriers abroad". Less than 15% of researchers can publish their academic research results internationally without obstacles, and only 11% can participate in foreign academic exchanges relatively freely and conveniently. More than 40% of researchers said that they "seldom have academic exchanges" and "lack relatively high-level academic exchange opportunities", and 16% of researchers still have obvious obstacles in terms of regions, institutions or languages even if they publish their scientific research results in China, reflecting that some researchers’ channels for participating in academic exchanges are not smooth enough, and their academic exchange ability needs to be further strengthened.


 


    Fourth, the publicity and transparency of the allocation mechanism of scientific and technological resources are not enough.


 


    For the research funding mechanism of local government departments, except for 32% researchers who did not give a clear judgment, less than 5% clearly chose "the whole funding mechanism is open and transparent", while the proportion that "the process is very opaque and all kinds of hidden rules are very serious" is as high as 13%, and 30% researchers think there are some unfair and unreasonable places, "but not very serious"; Another nearly 20% of the staff think it is not bad on the whole, which has greatly improved compared with the past. In addition, some researchers specifically mentioned the problem of "unfair project application" in the allocation of scientific research funds, which is reflected in the prevalence of "learning hegemony" in the formulation, application and evaluation of project guides. I hope that the setting and funding mechanism of related scientific research projects will be more open and transparent.


 


    Fifth, the academic community and scientific and technological associations have not played a sufficient role.


 


    Academic communities and scientific and technological societies are important carriers to strengthen the education of scientific values and integrity of researchers and promote academic exchanges. According to the survey, nearly one-third of the researchers’ overall impression of the scientific and technological associations in this region said that they seldom contact with scientific and technological organizations, more than half thought that the scientific and technological organizations in this region were not active enough, nearly 8% said they knew something about a certain scientific and technological association, and less than 3% of the researchers had a better understanding of the society and gave a "good impression" evaluation. It can be seen that the majority of scientific researchers have obviously insufficient understanding and participation in scientific and technological associations, and the scientific and technological associations that should play an important role as carriers and intermediaries in developing academic norms, shaping scientific values and promoting academic exchanges have not fully played their roles at present. Strengthening the self-construction of "academic communities" and enhancing the value recognition of scientific researchers are the weak links in the current development of China’s scientific community.


 


    Sixth, the overall cultural atmosphere of social innovation is not ideal.


 


    A good social innovation atmosphere is an important prerequisite to stimulate the innovation enthusiasm and vitality of researchers, and it is also an important aspect that researchers pay attention to. It is found that the atmosphere of social tolerance failure, challenge to academic authority and academic independence, which are necessary for creative work, is not highly evaluated by researchers. Nearly half of the researchers think it is general, and the proportion of ideal or unsatisfactory is about 20%. In terms of improving the social image and political status of scientific and technological personnel, 50% of scientific and technological personnel think that there is no obvious difference from other occupations. Among them, only 19% think that the social status of researchers in this area has been greatly improved, and nearly a quarter of researchers think that despite a lot of publicity in various aspects, there has been no substantial improvement; Generally speaking, most researchers think that compared with other groups, the social status has not improved much.


 


    Analysis of the crux of the above problems mainly lies in the lack of creativity of scientific researchers and the low level of independent management of scientific research activities.


 


    First, the substantial increase in investment in science and technology has improved the working conditions of researchers, but it will not automatically bring about the same improvement in the satisfaction of researchers with the scientific research environment.


 


    According to the survey, the higher the level of researchers, the more scientific and technological resources they occupy, and the higher the quality requirements for the scientific research environment. Senior and senior researchers who have studied abroad and are at the top of the group of researchers are significantly superior to other groups in terms of basic conditions for scientific research, research funds, publication of achievements and opportunities for academic exchange, and they are also in a dominant position in teamwork. At the same time, they attach great importance to the norms of teamwork and have higher requirements for the scientific research management level of their units. This situation shows that innovation management and cultural issues are replacing the lack of investment in science and technology, and become the main problems restricting the improvement of the current scientific research environment in China. It requires government management departments and various scientific research institutions to explore macro-and micro-management mechanisms that are more in line with the laws of scientific and technological innovation activities.


 


    Second, the conflict between the increasing demand for scientific autonomy and the administrative science and technology management system has become one of the main contradictions in the macro-management system of science and technology in China.


 


    The intervention of too many external administrative forces makes the degree of independent management of scientific researchers, scientific research institutions and scientific communities insufficient, which not only reduces the efficiency of scientific research and management, but also affects the enthusiasm and sense of accomplishment of scientific researchers as knowledge workers. In particular, some scientific research institutions and management departments lack of attention to the laws of scientific research and innovation activities, and the management methods focus on planning and administration. There is a big gap between the management ability of creative activities and the actual needs of scientific researchers, which leads to the phenomenon of simple management methods, repeated work by scientific researchers and a lot of work in vain to some extent. In addition, the imperfect public participation mechanism in the allocation mechanism of scientific and technological resources leads to the insufficient participation of the scientific community and the public in public scientific and technological affairs, and the low recognition of the fairness and impartiality of the government in allocating resources is also an important reason that affects the positive evaluation of the scientific research environment by researchers.


 


    In short, although the scientific research infrastructure conditions of various units have improved significantly in recent years, all units and government scientific and technological management departments are also vigorously strengthening scientific research performance management, promoting scientific research cooperation, and actively introducing a series of incentive policies for scientific and technological innovation; However, the survey found that researchers still generally feel that it is difficult to give full play to their creativity, and their units and scientific and technological management departments lack systematic and efficient innovation management capabilities, which has become the main obstacle to improving the scientific research environment. This also means that innovation management and cultural issues are replacing the overall lack of investment in scientific and technological resources, becoming an important factor affecting researchers to judge the quality of scientific research environment, and further requiring government management departments and various scientific research institutions to explore macro-and micro-management mechanisms that are more in line with the laws of scientific and technological innovation activities.


 


Suggestions on respecting the law of scientific research activities and promoting the process of independent management of scientific research institutions and researchers


 


    To improve the scientific research environment, we must strengthen the regular understanding of scientific research activities and management, give full play to the initiative and creativity of scientific and technological personnel, and greatly expand the participation scope and discourse power of scientific communities and the public in government scientific and technological affairs. The research group suggested that:


 


    Efforts should be made to ensure the time for scientific researchers to directly engage in scientific research activities.


 


    Increase the steady support for public scientific research institutions, simplify the scientific research management and evaluation mechanism, and shorten the time for scientific researchers to participate in administrative affairs and other social affairs activities; With the positive attitude of "releasing water to raise fish", we will support scientific researchers to concentrate on their scientific research work, and guide front-line scientific researchers to gradually increase their time directly engaged in scientific research activities to three-fifths or even more than four-fifths of their normal working hours.


 


    Piloting the reform of the comprehensive supporting system of different types of scientific research institutions.


 


    Actively explore the governance model of public scientific research institutions in the new period, and select some basic and public research institutes with high scientific research level to carry out pilot reform of comprehensive supporting system. The pilot work focuses on rationalizing the operating mechanism of scientific research institutions in terms of personnel, finance, materials, activities and comprehensive management, and establishes a coordinated scientific research management system of personnel-post-funds-activities-evaluation; While fully mobilizing the initiative and enthusiasm of researchers, we should strengthen the independent management of scientific research at all levels and stimulate the creativity of researchers.


 


    Strengthen the right to speak of scientific community in scientific and technological affairs of the whole society.


 


    Give full play to the academic norms and value guidance functions of the scientific community. Gradually reduce all kinds of scientific and technological awards led by the government; Strengthen the leading role of professional societies, trade associations and other professional groups and social organizations in academician selection, scientific and technological awards and evaluation, suppression of academic misconduct, establishment of academic journals, and dissemination of scientific and technological news; Strengthen peer review in scientific research organization evaluation, project evaluation, talent recruitment and other matters; Let the scientific community rebuild academic norms and innovative values.


 


    Establish a more transparent and higher social participation mechanism for the allocation of scientific and technological resources.


 


    Reform the allocation mechanism of public scientific and technological resources, improve the participation of scientists and the public in the process of public scientific and technological decision-making and project organization and implementation, and reduce the direct intervention of government departments in the process of scientific and technological project organization and implementation. Strengthen the construction of social supervision and management mechanism, and promote the opening of all kinds of scientific and technological projects and scientific and technological infrastructure supported by public finance to the whole society.


 


    Significantly increase the budget for supporting scientific researchers to "go global".


 


    Implement the strategy of "going out" for researchers, and rapidly improve their research vision and international communication ability. Significantly increase the amount of international scientific and technological cooperation and exchange funds of the National Scholarship Fund Committee, China Academy of Sciences and other departments, while building a high-level international academic exchange platform, increase support for front-line scientific researchers and young and middle-aged scientific research management backbones, and maintain the growth rate of more than 30% for three to four consecutive years.


 


    Explore the implementation of "inclusive" science and technology policies and encourage "mass innovation".


 


    Taking generate, which encourages and stimulates the creativity of the whole society, as an important part of the construction of innovative cities, we should not explore and implement the "inclusive" all-staff innovation project for all kinds of enterprises, institutions and the public based on the qualification theory of innovative subjects; Continue to promote the work deployment of "Several Opinions on Strengthening the Work of Innovative Methods" by the four national ministries and commissions, and constantly promote and popularize the knowledge of innovation methodology such as TRIZ in society and various enterprises and institutions; Increase the creative methods and scientific aesthetic education content in primary and secondary education, vocational education and training, and higher education, and form a pluralistic and inclusive mass innovation culture atmosphere for all social subjects. (Author of research group of Institute of Science and Technology Policy and Management Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences: Leng Min, Song Qi) 


 


Continue reading »