The same 150 thousand, I would rather buy sagitar than Passat, and be careful to fall into the consumption trap of car companies

Is Passat worse than sagitar?

《》

The automobile market is changing, and the price war is filled with smoke. At present, many consumers are struggling: Do you choose Volkswagen Sagitar or Passat for the same budget of 150,000 yuan? On the surface, Passat is higher in rank and larger in size.Seems to have more face. However, under careful investigation, there is a hidden mystery, and many consumers may fall into the "consumption trap" carefully set by car companies.

Let’s tear open the gorgeous coat of Passat’s low-profile model.Reveal the unknown secrets behind it. From the aspects of power performance, actual configuration, usability, etc., sagitar and Passat are compared and analyzed in all directions.Point out the right choice direction for consumers.

Dynamic performance: the embarrassing task of small horse-drawn carts

Passat, as a B-class car,The body size and curb weight are obviously larger than sagitar. However, the low-profile Passat is equipped with the previous generation 1.4T engine, and its power parameters are not even as good as sagitar’s 1.5T engine. This has caused the embarrassing situation of "small horse-drawn carts".

Driving the Passat low-end version on the road,It’s hard to push the accelerator to the end, only the roar of the engine can be heard. The power output can’t keep up with the driver’s intention, which not only affects the driving pleasure,There are also some security risks. Insufficient power in overtaking, merging and other scenes is easy to cause danger.

In contrast, sagitar’s power output is more abundant. The golden partner of 1.5T engine and dry dual clutch gearbox,Let sagitar show good dynamic response and acceleration performance. Whether it’s urban roads or highways, sagitar can handle it with ease.

It is worth mentioning that the Passat low-profile version is not only less powerful than sagitar,The fuel consumption performance is also unsatisfactory. Small-displacement engines carry large bodies and have to run at high load for a long time. inevitably will lead to higher fuel consumption. Sagitar is more economical in this respect,Daily use is more worry-free and saves money.

Configuration Shrinking: Visible "Cheap Feeling"

In addition to dynamic performance,The "shrinking" degree of Passat’s low-profile version in terms of configuration is staggering. As a B-class car,Passat’s low-profile version is not even equipped with the most basic reversing image.This is rare in the current automobile market.

The front radar, auxiliary driving system and driving mode selection are also absent. These features have long been standard in the same class.In Passat’s low-end edition, it was not paid. Driving such a "humble" B-class car, I’m afraid it’s hard to lose face.

In contrast, sagitar,The same price of around 150,000 can provide a richer configuration. L2 automatic driver assistance system, steering wheel heating, omni-directional active safety configuration, etc., which are unattainable functions on Passat low-profile version.It is standard on sagitar.

Even the steering wheel material, sagitar will win. Passat’s low-profile version uses a cheap plastic steering wheel.Sagitar, on the other hand, uses a more advanced material, which is superior in feel and texture.

It can be said that at the same price,Sagitar completely crushed Passat low-profile version in terms of configuration. This sharp contrast will undoubtedly make consumers feel lost in actual use.

Availability: a "mirage" that can be seen and touched.

Even if some consumers don’t care about the shortcomings of Passat’s low-grade version, they still favor it.I’m afraid it’s hard to get what I want in the end. The reason is that such low-priced models are often used by car companies to "sell dog meat by hanging sheep’s heads", and the actual output is extremely limited.

This move by car companies is intended to attract consumers’ attention through low-priced versions.Create the illusion of super cost performance. But in fact, they don’t want the low-profile version to become the main sales model. On the one hand, for the sake of brand image,On the other hand, it is profit-driven.

Therefore,The actual output of Passat’s low edition is extremely limited. And this is a scarce car source,A considerable number of them have been purchased in large quantities by car rental companies. When ordinary consumers rushed to the 4S shop,They are often greeted by a cold "out of stock".

This "visible, can’t buy" situation,Let many consumers feel deeply disappointed and angry. Some people even feel cheated, and their goodwill towards the brand is greatly reduced.

By contrast,Sagitar is well supplied in various configuration versions.Consumers can buy it if they want.Don’t worry about the supply problem. This practical and reliable car buying experience will undoubtedly win the trust and goodwill of consumers.

Cost of use: seemingly cheap, but actually more expensive.

When many consumers choose a car,Often only pay attention to the car purchase price, but ignore the subsequent use cost. In fact, Passat, as a class B car,The expenses in daily use are higher than sagitar.

The first is the insurance cost. The insurance premium of a vehicle is directly related to the price, displacement and other factors. Passat, as a higher-level model,Insurance premiums naturally rise. Even if it’s a low edition,Its insurance premium is also much higher than sagitar at the same price.

Followed by maintenance costs. The price of Passat parts is generally higher than sagitar, even the most basic consumables such as engine oil and machine filter.The price is also higher. Moreover, Passat’s maintenance cycle is usually shorter, which means that the owner needs to carry out maintenance more frequently.Invisibly increases the use cost.

Then there is the maintenance cost. In case of failure,Passat’s maintenance costs are often staggering. No matter the price of parts or working hours, it far exceeds the sagitar of the same level. For consumers who pursue cost performance,It is undoubtedly a heavy burden.

On the whole,Although the price of Passat low-profile version is comparable to sagitar, the actual cost may far exceed expectations after long-term use. This mode of "saving money in the early stage and spending a lot in the later stage",I am afraid it does not meet the psychological expectations of most consumers.

Quality experience: the gap between levels cannot be bridged.

Some people might say,Even if Passat’s low-profile version has such shortcomings,But after all, it is a B-class car.The overall quality should still be better than the sagitar of A-class cars, right? That was not the case.

First of all, in terms of body structure, Passat does use more thermoformed steel.Theoretically, the strength is higher. However, this advantage is difficult to be reflected in the low distribution version. Because the low edition often cuts corners in some details, such as the use of sound insulation materials. This leads to the fact that the quietness of Passat’s low-profile version is not as good as sagitar in actual driving.

Secondly,In terms of interior quality, Passat’s low-profile version is also hard to say. In order to reduce the cost, the low-priced version uses a lot of cheap hard plastic materials, and the interior work is also rough. On the other hand, sagitar, although at a lower level,However, in the interior materials and workmanship, it is unambiguous, giving people a better texture.

Furthermore, in the adjustment of the whole vehicle,Sagitar shows a higher level instead. Because the power matching is more reasonable, sagitar’s acceleration and flexibility are better than Passat’s low-profile version. In terms of manipulation,Sagitar’s performance is also better.Bring better driving pleasure to drivers.

It can be said that Passat’s low-profile version only has the name of B-class car, but in terms of actual quality experience,But it is suppressed by sagitar everywhere. This "not worthy of the name" situation, I am afraid that many buyers will feel deeply disappointed.

Cost performance: the game between truth and falsehood

On the surface,Similarly, you can buy a B-class car for about 150,000 yuan, and the Passat low-priced version seems to have a high cost performance. But on closer inspection,This "cost performance" is actually based on many compromises.

Lack of power, lack of configuration, and high use cost ….. These factors are combined together, which greatly reduces the actual value of Passat’s low-distribution version. Consumers spend the same money,In exchange, it is a "pseudo-B-class car" that is constrained everywhere.

In contrast, sagitar,Although the level is low, no matter the dynamic performance, configuration richness,Or the actual experience,Are better than Passat’s low-profile version. more importantly,Sagitar provides lower car cost and more reliable supply guarantee.These are real advantages.

In the long run,Sagitar is the real cost-effective choice. It can not only meet the actual car demand of consumers, but also bring better driving experience and lower car cost. In contrast, Passat’s low-priced version of "cost-effective" is more like a flashy packaging.Can’t stand the scrutiny.

Public opinion orientation: the collective awakening of consumers

With the increasing transparency of information,More and more consumers are beginning to realize the hidden "trap" behind Passat’s low-profile version. On major auto forums and social media,The heat of discussion on this topic continues to rise.

Many car owners have come forward to say that,I shared all kinds of unpleasant experiences after I bought Passat low-grade edition. Some people spit out all kinds of embarrassing scenes caused by insufficient motivation.Some people complain about the inconvenience caused by the lack of configuration.Others complain about the high use cost.

At the same time,Consumers who choose sagitar generally show higher satisfaction. They praised sagitar’s strong power performance, rich configuration and low use cost.Think that this is the real "value for money".

This sharp word-of-mouth contrast is quietly changing consumers’ car purchase orientation. More and more people are beginning to realize that,We should not only focus on the vehicle grade and brand, but also pay attention to the actual experience and comprehensive cost.

Expert opinion: treat "level trap" rationally.

In view of this phenomenon,Many auto industry experts have expressed their views. They agreed that consumers should not be confused by the grade and brand of vehicles.Instead, we should evaluate our own needs and the actual performance of vehicles more rationally.

Li Ming, a well-known car critic, said: "The higher the level, the better the vehicle. For ordinary households,An A-class car with abundant configuration and power may be more suitable than a B-class car with low configuration and insufficient power. Consumers should jump out of the’ level trap’,Choose the car that really suits you. "

Zhang Hua, an analyst in the automotive industry, pointed out: "Car companies have launched low-end and high-end models.Essentially, it is a marketing strategy. They hope to attract consumers through level advantage, and then guide users to buy higher configuration versions in actual sales. Consumers need to keep their eyes open,Don’t be fooled by superficial phenomena. "

In addition, many experts have emphasized the importance of considering the long-term use cost when choosing a car. They suggest that when making decisions,It depends not only on the initial purchase price, but also on the long-term expenses such as insurance, maintenance and repair.Make more rational choices.

Future trend: where is the market going?

Under the dual effects of increasingly rational consumers and increasingly fierce market competition,The future trend of the automobile market is worthy of attention.

First of all,The market space of low-grade and high-grade models may gradually shrink. As consumers become more aware of the true value of this type of vehicle, its appeal will be greatly reduced. Car companies may have to adjust their strategies.Reduce the promotion of such vehicles.

Secondly,Consumers’ car purchase decision-making factors will be more diversified. In addition to the traditional brand and grade considerations, factors such as power performance, actual configuration and use cost will receive more attention. This will force car companies to pay more attention to comprehensiveness and practicality in product design.

Furthermore, the marketing strategy of car companies may develop in a more transparent and honest direction. In today’s highly transparent information,Any behavior of "selling dog meat by hanging sheep’s head" may be strongly resisted by consumers. Honest management and customer demand-oriented will become the key for car companies to win.

The segmentation trend of the automobile market may be further strengthened. Car companies will pay more attention to differentiated competition and provide more accurate products for consumers with different needs. Under this trend,Simple "level division" may gradually fade away and be replaced by a more complex market segmentation pattern.

Consumer advice: keep your eyes open and be sensible.

Faced with the dazzling choice of models,How should consumers avoid falling into the "consumption trap"? The following suggestions may be referred to:

This article aims to advocate the positive energy of society, without vulgar and other bad guidance. Please contact us in time if copyright or character infringement is involved.